- From: Gary Brown <gary@pi4tech.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:48:49 +0100
- To: matthew@stickledown.com
- CC: public-ws-chor@w3.org
Hi At the moment I don't believe it is possible to define a role without a behavior - although the behavior does not need to define an interface. However, I agree that in situations where a role is only acting as a client then the behavior is irrelevant. Martin/Steve - should this be raised as an implementation issue? Regards Gary Matthew Rawlings wrote: > I followed your advice and turned each of my Participants into Roles. I > still have the problem I am not permitted to define Roles without behaviour. > How can I explicitly state a Role does not have behaviour? > > Matthew Rawlings > +44 791 539 7824 > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 12 June 2006 11:49:02 UTC