- From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@pi4tech.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:00:00 +0000
- To: "Paul Bouche \(HPI\)" <paul.bouche@hpi.uni-potsdam.de>
- Cc: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Deal Paul, Yes the channels where inspired by pi-calculus. They are a channel or port pairing. The work of our invited experts looks at providing a new calculus called CG (Global Calculus). When we project participants we do so to an EPC (End Point Calculus) which is pi-calculus with session types. The session information comes from the identity tokens described as part of a channel type. This EPC is what we use to enforce liveness and other relevant properties (bi-simulation etc). The plan is to publish the finished treatment of GC and EPC sometime in Q22006 as a working note. Hope this helps Steve T On 16 Jan 2006, at 21:54, Paul Bouche ((HPI)) wrote: > > Hello, > > I am doing a research presentation as part of a seminar "Business > Process Managment II" on the topic of "Is WS-CDL 'based' on > Pi-Calculus?".. > I have read some material that the invited experts have publizied and > could not find a concluding answer. Maybe there is none? > > It would be very helpful for me if anyone of the invited experts could > post a clarification on this issue. From the material I have read and > from reading the WS-CDL specification my opinion is that some parts of > WS-CDL (namely: channelTypes, channelType instance variables, sending > of those and some other parts) have be inspired by the concepts > Pi-Calculus or other process calculi. > > Thanks for your help. > Kind Regards, > > Paul Bouché > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 10:00:19 UTC