- From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@pi4tech.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:39:52 +0100
- To: Roberto Lucchi <lucchi@cs.unibo.it>
- Cc: Claudio Guidi <cguidi@cs.unibo.it>, public-ws-chor@w3.org
Roberto, are you in touch with Honda, Yoshida and Carbone at all? They have been doing work not unrelated but certainly a different facet to yours in looking at liveness and looking at both a global and an end-point calculus which form the basis of the formal semantics for CDL both now and in the future. You can get their details from the WS-CDL membership list. I shall take a look at the paper. Cheers Steve T On 13 Sep 2005, at 11:31, Roberto Lucchi wrote: > > Dear all, > > I would like to point out that a paper which deals with choreography > languages and in particular on the interaction patterns when alignment > property is considered has been published in the proceeding of 2nd > International Workshop on Web Services and Formal Methods WS-FM'05, > LNCS 3670. > > Here we report the abstract, we hope this can help and stimulate the > discussion about the right interaction patterns that should be used at > the choreography level. > > Abstract: > Choreography languages provide a top-view design way for > describing complex systems composed of services distributed over the > network. The basic building block of such languages is the interaction > between two peers which are of two kinds: request and request-respond. > WS-CDL, which is the most representative choreography language, > supports a pattern for programming the request interaction and two > patterns > for the request-respond one. Furthermore, it allows to specify if an > interaction is aligned or not whose meaning is related to the > possibility to > control when the interaction completes. In this paper we reason about > interaction patterns by analyzing their adequacy when considering the > fact that they have to support the alignment property. We show the > inadequacy of the two patterns supporting the request-respond > interaction; > one of them because it does not permit to reason on alignment at the > right granularity level and the other one for some expressiveness > lacks. > > The paper is also available at the following URL: > http://www.cs.unibo.it/~lucchi/pubbl.html > > Best regards, > Roberto > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2005 11:40:06 UTC