Dear Colleagues, An editing question: in section 2.3.3 <roleType name="Buyer"> . . . </roleType> <roleType name="SellerForBuyer"> <behavior name="sellerForBuyer" interface="rns:sellerForBuyerPT"/> </roleType> <roleType name="SellerForShipper"> <behavior name="sellerForShipper" interface="rns:sellerForShipperPT"/> </roleType> <roleType name="Shipper"> . . . </roleType> <relationshipType name="Buyer-Seller"> <role type="tns:Buyer" /> <role type="tns:SellerForBuyer" /> </relationshipType> <relationshipType name="Seller-Shipper"> <role type="tns:SellerForShipper" /> <role type="tns:Shipper" /> </relationshipType> <participantType name="Broker"> <role type="tns:SellerForBuyer" /> <role type="tns:SellerForShipper" /> </participantType> should the two rns: name prefixes be tns: or are they deliberately different? Best Regards Tony A M Fletcher Cohesions (TM) Business transaction management software for application coordination www.choreology.com <http://www.choreology.com/> Choreology Ltd., 68 Lombard Street, London EC3V 9LJ UK Tel: +44 (0) 1473 729537 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801 948219 tony.fletcher@choreology.com (Home: amfletcher@iee.org)Received on Friday, 18 March 2005 21:41:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:30 UTC