- From: Gary Brown <gary@enigmatec.net>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:18:57 -0000
- To: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2005 14:19:07 UTC
Suggestion from Kohei based on his analysis of the workunit semantics for repetition: > > We therefore believe it is better to have two workunits, one for non-repeating, > and another for repeating. If this is too radical, then we recommend not to have > two conditions, but to differentiate between repeating and non-repeating by: > > repeat = true|false Regards Gary and Steve
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2005 14:19:07 UTC