W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > April 2005

Fwd: Proposal clarification fro WG requested to issue 1166

From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:39:44 +0100
Message-Id: <faef6426522695bf7f9ae63eacd2dc17@enigmatec.net>
To: "'WS-Choreography List'" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>



Begin forwarded message:

> From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@pi4tech.com>
> Date: 18 April 2005 15:19:58 BST
> To: 'WS-Choreography List' <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
> Subject: Proposal clarification fro WG requested to issue 1166
>
> ISSUE:
> 	http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1166
>
> In order to progress this issue we request WG guidance by email on a 
> couple of points relating to this issue and the sketch proposal 
> therein.
>
> 1. Do you agree with using the "perform" as the basis for this 
> proposal? If not why not and what alternative do you have?
>
> 2. How best should trailing sub choreographies be handled? Should 
> there be a terminate activity, or should they be automatically 
> terminated when the performing choreo completes? If neither then what 
> alternative mechanism do you propose?
>
> Cheers
>
> Steve T
>
Received on Monday, 18 April 2005 14:39:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:31 UTC