- From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:39:44 +0100
- To: "'WS-Choreography List'" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Begin forwarded message: > From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@pi4tech.com> > Date: 18 April 2005 15:19:58 BST > To: 'WS-Choreography List' <public-ws-chor@w3.org> > Subject: Proposal clarification fro WG requested to issue 1166 > > ISSUE: > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1166 > > In order to progress this issue we request WG guidance by email on a > couple of points relating to this issue and the sketch proposal > therein. > > 1. Do you agree with using the "perform" as the basis for this > proposal? If not why not and what alternative do you have? > > 2. How best should trailing sub choreographies be handled? Should > there be a terminate activity, or should they be automatically > terminated when the performing choreo completes? If neither then what > alternative mechanism do you propose? > > Cheers > > Steve T >
Received on Monday, 18 April 2005 14:39:52 UTC