- From: Furniss, Peter <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:12:50 +0100
- To: "Steve Ross-Talbot" <steve@enigmatec.net>, "WS-Choreography List" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
- Cc: "Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
The pattern suggested here would seem reasonable, but we really need to find some alternatives to "from" and "to" as attribute names for participate, as I think was said in one of the earlier discussions. The problem is most of the alternative word-pairs have other connotations that aren't helpful. Some possible pairs: a) from - to b) client - server c) user - interface d) initiator - responder e) user - service Since the operation and its especially the direction of its actions are explictily references to an interface definition, I lean to c), making obvious the sense that "this interaction is defined from a perspective where <rolea> provides the interface, and the other side is <roleb>" Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Ross-Talbot [mailto:steve@enigmatec.net] > Sent: 10 October 2004 20:56 > To: WS-Choreography List > Cc: Martin Chapman > Subject: WSDL example as per F2F action item > > > Please can we schedule time on the next call to discuss (from Gary). > > Cheers > > Steve T > > > Choreology Anti virus scan completed
Received on Monday, 11 October 2004 10:13:55 UTC