- From: Charlton Barreto <cbarreto@webmethods.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:36:07 -0800
- To: public-ws-chor@w3.org
- Message-Id: <74735D46-326D-11D9-9908-000A95BD8B54@webmethods.com>
Thank you. I've corrected the references therein; the updated proposal is attached. -Charlton.
On 09/11/2004, at 08:10, Chiusano Joseph wrote: > I would respectfully recommend that WS-Reliability and > WS-ReliableMessaging (which are intended to represent the same > specification) be referred to as OASIS Web Services Reliable Messaging > (WSRM) or WS-Reliability, so as not to be confused with the > Microsoft/IBM/others specification called WS-ReliableMessaging. > > Kind Regards, > Joseph Chiusano > Booz Allen Hamilton > Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Charlton Barreto >> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 2:36 AM >> To: public-ws-chor@w3.org >> Subject: Proposal on WS-Chor dependencies >> >> Hello all, >> >> Attached is my proposal covering the relationship of WS-Chor >> to a number of dependent specs. Please provide any feedback >> you may have on this. >> >> Cheers, >> >> -Charlton. >> >>
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: Dependencies.pdf
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 16:36:53 UTC