Hi Nick, Hi all,
I finally got a chance to read the draft again. Attached please find my comments.
I am certainly grateful to the great work Nick has put into this draft. As a deliverable of the working group, I feel we still need a lot of editing work to make the spec more precise. In general, the draft reads more like a technical journal paper than a standard specification. Choreography defines interfaces among different participants, precision and un-ambiguity of the specification is ultimately important. I feel it's really necessary to follow the WSDL2.0 model and rewrite the spec using XML infoset.
Best Regards,
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Mischkinsky
Sent: Monday, Mar 01, 2004 06:11 AM
To: public-ws-chor@w3.org
Subject: Re: pdf - WS Choreography Description Language, Version 1 (Editor's Draft)
Hi,
Here's the pdf version:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Mar/0002.html
cheers,
jeff
At 03:29 AM 3/1/2004, Greg Ritzinger wrote:
>The current thinking on the ws-choreography description language can be
>found at the following URL:
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Mar/0001.html
>
>Nick / Greg
Jeff Mischkinsky jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com
Consulting Member Technical Staff +1(650)506-1975
Director, Web Services Standards 500 Oracle Parkway M/S 4OP9
Oracle Corporation Redwood Shores, CA 94065