- From: Anders W. Tell <opensource@toolsmiths.se>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:17:20 +0200
- To: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
- Cc: WS-Choreography List <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Hi , I have not followed the details in the CDL work but have a question. How do you plan to handle "risk-allocation" which is neccessary for eCommerce? Riskallocation in it simplest form is that the sender OR receiver is responsible to make sure that a message or notice is communication from sender to receiver. /anders Steve Ross-Talbot wrote: > > Summary: > CDL - Issue I-03 > > Description: > Issue I-03. Do we add additional standard states to describe the > outcomes of using reliable messaging protocols? Similarly, should we > include additional states to handle other outcomes, such as security > failure > > Resolution: > No we do not need any states at all. We simply need some mechanism for > the naming of a state or an observable interaction or non-interaction. > WS-CDL already supports this so there is nothing further to do. > > Proposal: > Change status from ASSIGNED to RESOLVED WONTFIX >
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 07:18:32 UTC