- From: Haugen Robert <Robert.Haugen@choreology.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 19:25:49 +0100
- To: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Monica Martin wrote: > I am not certain that the message exchange achieves > 'real state alignment' I agree. Do people disagree with Tony and my message that six other specifications are already competing to try to define this area? (Maybe it was too long?) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2004Jul/0017.html Seven if you count ebXML BPSS/OASIS ebpp/RosettaNet/UNCEFACT BCF as one? Or nine or ten if you consider that all of those specs, derived from RosettaNet, have forked subtly since their derivation? Do you really want to work on yet another business state alignment protocol?
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2004 14:26:25 UTC