- From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:40:45 +0000
- To: WS Choreography (E-mail) <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
How does this leave our stuff wrt the Barros usecase? Cheers Steve T Begin forwarded message: > From: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> > Date: 11 February 2004 20:44:41 GMT > To: "Steve Ross-Talbot" <steve@enigmatec.net> > Subject: RE: WSDL and pub/sub > > WSDL 2.0 part 3 [1] describes some message exchange patterns that can > be > used as part of a pub/sub solution. Look at all the "out-*" patterns > starting at section 3.4. A complete pub/sub solution is not provided, > as the address and mechanics of "sub"ing and providing the address for > the "pub" to be delivered are not standardized in WSDL (perhaps this is > an orchestration problem?). Note that the HTTP and SOAP bindings don't > support these message exchange patterns yet, but we have an issue open > on whether we should rectify this. > > Hope this helps. > > [1] > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20- > patterns. > html#out-only > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Steve Ross-Talbot [mailto:steve@enigmatec.net] >> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 10:07 AM >> To: Jonathan Marsh >> Subject: WSDL and pub/sub >> >> Jonathan, >> >> I seem to recollect that you indiciated that WSDL2.0 includes an MEP > or >> some such facility to represent pub/sub as a means of communication. >> Could you verify this? And could you point me to the appropriate >> description? This is something that the Choreography WG would very > much >> like to have so that a single message could be sent to multiple >> sources without needing to bind to those sources. >> >> >> Best Regards >> >> Steve Ross-Talbot >> co-Chair W3C Web Services Choreography >> >> O: +44 207 397 8207 >> C: +44 7855 268 848 >> www.enigmatec.net
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2004 08:40:54 UTC