Re: ws-chor 12/8/2004: My Comments through 2.5.2 from Monica J. Martin on 2004-12-12 (public-ws-chor@w3.org from December 2004)

From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 20:04:52 -0800
To: Haugen Robert <Robert.Haugen@choreology.com>
Cc: public-ws-chor@w3.org
Message-id: <41BBC364.3040701@sun.com>

Haugen Robert wrote:

>Mostly written by Monica Martin, but agreed to by Bob Haugen (author of
>the original sentence) here is a clearer replacement for a confusing
>sentence on page 37:
>
>Change from: "One "undo" Finalizer Block along with a "close" Finalizer
>Block to signal
>that the "undo" Finalizer Block is no longer able to be enabled, that
>is, the
>Choreography is now closed."
>
>Change to: 
>One "undo" Finalizer Block and one "close" Finalizer Block. If the
>"close" Finalizer is enabled, then the Choreography will be closed, and
>the "undo" Finalizer Block can no longer be enabled.
>
>(Monica, is that ok?)
>
>
>Choreology Anti virus scan completed
>  
>
Sure!

Received on Sunday, 12 December 2004 06:26:55 UTC