- From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:25:42 +0000
- To: WS-Choreography List <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Section 1.4: In addition, support for including and referencing service definitions given in WSDL 1.1 as constrained by WS-I Basic Profile [Action: add references] is a normative part of the WS-CDL specification. No references given. Section 1.5: A Choreography Description Language is not an "executable business process description language" or an implementation language. The role of specifyingthe execution logic of an applicationwill be covered by these specifications [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 26]. Probably should change to: A Choreography Description Language is not an "executable business process description language" or an implementation language. The role of specifyingthe execution logic of an applicationwill be covered by these [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 26] and other specifications. Section 2: Removal of the phrase "peer to peer" - why was this done? Didn't spot it before in the F2F document. Section 2.3.4: If the element passing is missing then this Channel Type MAY be used for exchanging information but MUST NOT be used for passing Channels of any Channel Type. THANK YOU.
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2004 18:25:57 UTC