- From: Gary Brown <gary@enigmatec.net>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 09:53:24 -0000
- To: "Nickolas Kavantzas" <nickolas.kavantzas@oracle.com>, "WS-Choreography List" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>, "Steve Ross-Talbot" <steve@enigmatec.net>
Nick, Referring back to the original proposal submissions, or early combined drafts of the ORACLE+CommerceOne work may show the original intent, but that does not change the fact that the Sept 22nd draft clearly states the fact that a blocking workunit, whose guard condition evaluates to false, will fail to match and therefore be skipped. This is the semantics that Steve and I, and possibly some others, have come to expect and think is appropriate. You must also bear in mind that I only became fully active within the group around the time that this draft was adopted, and therefore this became my understanding of where CDL had progressed to. So referring back to previous intent is not relevant for me - only what was clearly documented and adopted by the group at that time. The fact that this raises other issues that need to be addressed, does not change the fact that we believe this is the most intuitive semantics for the workunit guard condition. Regards Gary
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2004 09:53:47 UTC