Tuesday, 21 December 2004
Monday, 20 December 2004
Friday, 17 December 2004
Tuesday, 14 December 2004
- Slides used with JPM
- Re: [wsbpel] [uddi-spec] WS-BPEL TN scope OK - but how about working with us on a B2B collaboration TN?
- WS-Chor Primer
- Re: A proposal for a draft outline for the W3C WS-Choreography description language Primer
Monday, 13 December 2004
- DRAFT AGENDA for 14th December conf call
- [Ann] The First UK Young Researchers Workshop on Service Oriented Computing
Sunday, 12 December 2004
Friday, 10 December 2004
- Re: ws-chor 12/8/2004: My Comments through 2.5.2
- FW: WS-CDL v1, last call doc (dec 8, 2004)
- Fwd: A very brief summary of my view on the latest Editor's Draft on WS-CDL.
- Re: Reassertion of the request for clarification on short circuit evaluation
- Reassertion of the request for clarification on short circuit evaluation
- Re: WS-CDL v1, last call doc (dec 8, 2004)
Thursday, 9 December 2004
- Comments on hopefully last draft of CDL this side of last call
- RE: [wsbpel] [uddi-spec] WS-BPEL TN scope OK - but how about working with us on a B2B collaboration TN?
- Re: WorkUnit guard semantics issue
Wednesday, 8 December 2004
- RE: [wsbpel] [uddi-spec] WS-BPEL TN scope OK - but how about working with us on a B2B collaboration TN?
- Re: WorkUnit guard semantics issue
- Re: [wsbpel] [uddi-spec] WS-BPEL TN scope OK - but how about working with us on a B2B collaboration TN?
- Re: ws-chor 12/8/2004: My Comments through 2.5.2
- Re: ws-chor 12/8/2004: My Comments through 2.5.2
- Fwd: WorkUnit guard semantics issue
- ws-chor 12/8/2004: My Comments through 2.5.2
- Dec 3rd Editors Draft under review this week
Tuesday, 7 December 2004
- Re: My comments on CDL on section 2.5.3 and beyond
- My comments on CDL on section 2.5.3 and beyond
- My comments on CDL on section 2.4.3 through 2.5.2
- Comments on the 3 Dec 04 CDL specification
- Comments on section 2.5.3 and beyond
- Re: Workunit blocking - an alternative that addresses both sets of required semantics
- RE: Workunit blocking - an alternative that addresses both sets of required semantics
- Comments on 2.5.3 onwards
- Re: Workunit blocking - an alternative that addresses both sets of required semantics
- Text for Relationship with WS-Addressing
Monday, 6 December 2004
- Re: Workunit blocking - an alternative that addresses both sets of required semantics
- Workunit blocking - an alternative that addresses both sets of required semantics
- Re: My comments on CDL up to Section 2.4.2
- Fw: Latest Editor's WS-CDL document dec-03-2004
- Fw: Latest Editor's WS-CDL document dec-03-2004