- From: Tony Fletcher <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:44:30 +0100
- To: "'WS-Choreography List'" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>, <public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 16 April 2004 10:45:04 UTC
Dear Colleagues, Back in February (16 Feb 04) I made a contribution to the group that had two main parts (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2004Feb/0024.html). The second part asked how the basic transaction demarcation requirements could be satisfied by the proposed language. Maybe this has been discussed at a meeting when I was not present, but I have not been notified of any discussion or proposed resolution. I have updated (except for the example) the contribution I made back in December 03 on explicit transaction which is my proposal for how to meet these requirements. Please find attached. I would like this to be added to the list of issues, or a pointer provided to the resolution and rationale . Thanks and Best Regards Tony A M Fletcher Home: 35, Wimborne Avenue, IPSWICH IP3 8QW Tel: +44 (0) 1473 729537 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801 948219 amfletcher@iee.org (also tony.fletcher@talk21.com & tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com)
Received on Friday, 16 April 2004 10:45:04 UTC