W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > April 2004

Re: question: relation between WS-CDL and WSCI

From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 13:39:48 +0100
Message-Id: <51E23CD1-8BB5-11D8-8518-000393D13C9A@enigmatec.net>
Cc: "WS-Choreography List" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
To: "Titi Roman" <dumitru.roman@deri.ie>


The relationship is described in our charter (). WSCI will not progress 
further. WS-CDL will progress further. WSCI was the basis of a W3C 
working note that preceeded the formation of the W3C Web Services 
Choreography Working Group. It forms an input into the work of the 
working group but does not define it nor restrict it. WSCL was also a 
working note and BPML, DAML/S and BPEL4WS were all listed as inputs. 
The only difference is that WSCI and WSCL are W3C working notes and the 
others are not (maybe not true in the case of DAML/S).

I hope that explains it. It would be better for the community at large 
to forget about WSCL and WSCI. Unless you are doing a history 
assignment they have very little of any relevance anymore.


Steve T

On 10 Apr 2004, at 14:51, Titi Roman wrote:

> Hi,
> I would like to ask you which is the relation between the WS-CDL and 
> WSCI 1.0 (I even see a reference ([15]) in WS-CDL editor's 
> draft(http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/chor/edcopies/cdl/cdl.html) which is 
> never used)?
> What was wrong with the WSCI such that a new choreography language 
> (WS-CDL) was needed?
> Thank you,
> Titi Roman
Received on Sunday, 11 April 2004 08:38:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:24 UTC