- From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 07:32:17 +0000
- To: public-ws-chor@w3.org
As an aside from all of the stuff going on in requirements I would be interested on peoples take on what Frank postulated as a distinction between the O word and the C word. As a guiding principle in how we may view a CDL is this helpful? Suppose we changed it slightly to read: A written choreography description documents how a set of Web Services should be "used". This minor change could then incorporate design-time use as well as run-time use (for conformance and compliance to a choreography). On the other hand WS-BPEL executable processes falls into the latter (the O-word) and abstract processes are a modified lesser form of contract such as: A written business protocol (i.e. abstract WS-BPEL) description describes how a single Web Service should be "used". Just a thought .... Cheers Steve T Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: public-ws-chor@w3.org > From: Frank McCabe <frankmccabe@mac.com> > Date: Tue Sep 23, 2003 2:36:33 am Europe/London > To: public-ws-chor@w3.org > Subject: A trial balloon distinction between choreography & > orchestration > > > I am aware that the O word is taboo. However, the following occurred > to me during the last F2F: > > A written choreography description documents how to *use* a set of Web > services > A written orchestration description documents how to *control* a set > of Web services > > Comments? > Frank > > This email is confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If > you are not the intended recipient, please do not copy or disclose > its content but delete the email and contact the sender immediately. > Whilst we run antivirus software on all internet emails we are not > liable for any loss or damage. The recipient is advised to run their > own antivirus software. > This email is confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not copy or disclose its content but delete the email and contact the sender immediately. Whilst we run antivirus software on all internet emails we are not liable for any loss or damage. The recipient is advised to run their own antivirus software.
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 03:42:50 UTC