- From: Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 11:05:39 -0700
- To: "Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>
- CC: Jean-Jacques Dubray <jjd@eigner.com>, "'Burdett, David'" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, Daniel_Austin@grainger.com, public-ws-chor@w3.org
+1 arkin Yaron Y. Goland wrote: >Based on this thread I would like to put forward a proposal to the group for >a set of requirements that I hope can bring this thread to a successful >conclusion: > >"The WS-Chor specification MUST NOT adopt a design that prevents it from >taking full advantage of all features in WSDL 1.2. The WS-Chor specification >MAY adopt a design that enables the use of alternative message description >than WSDL 1.2 where and when the working group decides this is appropriate >and does not conflict with any other requirements." > >I would then propose that we table this issue until we finish with the >requirements and start doing design so we can look at exactly what an >abstract design would require and then decide if we want to try it. > > Yaron > >
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 02:46:18 UTC