Feedback on WSDL?

• From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
• Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 13:19:10 +0200
• To: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
• CC: Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>, Jean-Jacques Dubray <jjd@eigner.com>, "'Burdett David'" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, Daniel_Austin@grainger.com, public-ws-chor@w3.org
• Message-ID: <3ECB60AE.4070008@crf.canon.fr>

(Speaking only for myself, but) I feel quite confident that the WSD WG
would welcome (focused) feedback or input from this WG. This might 
happen, for example, when the WSD WG releases its next WD.

Given the WG's schedules, it looks to me like you might be in a good 
position to use WSDL 1.2.

Jean-Jacques.

Martin Chapman wrote:
> Asaf,
> 
> A very good point as to which part of wsdl (abstract, concrete).
> 
> We need to also consider which version of wsdl. Should we tie
> ourselves to the yet to be completed wsdl 1.2 or use 1.1. The
> disadvantage of 1.2 is that it is not stable at the present. This
> could also be an advantage, as it provides a possibility for this
> group to input requirements, and give opinions on proposed
> directions.
> 
> Martin.

Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2003 07:19:47 UTC