- From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 12:36:07 +0100
- To: "'Jeff Mischkinsky'" <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com>, "'Howard N Smith'" <howard.smith@ontology.org>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Indeed it was sent to the individuals but in their capacity as newly appointed co-chairs. I suspect this is why they responded in the way that they did, namely to ceck with the TC members that it is okay for them to attend. We tried to make the invitation as open as possible simply because we seek to encourage cooperation in an open manner rather than have any pre-conceived ideas about how it might work. We have yet to hear from them because the conference call is not until the 16th and the f2f (theirs) in late May. So we shall just have to wait. But I am full of hope that common sense will prevail and we shall all (W3C and Oasis) get the result that is required. It won't be for lack of openess and for lack trying. Cheers Steve T -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Mischkinsky Sent: 12 May 2003 12:02 To: Howard N Smith; public-ws-chor@w3.org Subject: RE: Liaison between WS BPEL TC and W3C WS Choreography FWIW, I note that this invitation went to the Chairs, as individuals. jeff At 06:30 AM 5/10/2003, Howard N Smith wrote: >Did you ever get a reply to the letter Martin? > >--- > >Dear Diane and John, Congratulations on the formation of the WS BPEL TC >in >OASIS. As co-chairs of the W3C Web Services Choreography working group we >understand the efforts that will be involved, and wish you the best of >luck. We firmly believe that the orchestration/choreography is a big >space. Furthermore we believe that there is room for non-overlapping specs >in this area, that can lead to a family of complimentary languages. This >will benefit the community and more importantly customers. It is our >intention to liaise closely with groups in this space in a manner that is >constructive and non-intrusive, in order to ensure we can provide maximum >benefit to the community and customers. With the formation of your group, >the WS BPEL TC, and the focus of your groups work we would very much like >to pursue a liaison with you. In addition the two groups will no doubt >have common requirements on other groups such as, for example, the need >for end-point references in WSDL 1.2. We fee! > l it makes sense to explore these requirements together and submit them > to the appropriate group as one voice, albeit from two groups. To further > explore possible liaisons and to ensure that we understand how we can be > of mutual benefit we cordially invite you to our next face to face > meeting on 18-20 June in Chicago. We would like you to meet the group, of > which we share a considerable overlap in membership, and talk about ways > in which we can work together for mutual benefit. For the purpose of > clarity, we are not requiring you to join the working group to pursue > this, merely to attend the face to face meeting as invited guests. Please > let us know if you are interested and we can forward on registration and > logistics information when they become available. Best regards, Martin > Chapman (Oracle) & Steve Ross-Talbot (Enigmatec) Co-chairs W3C > Choreography Working Group > > >--- > >New Book - Business Process Management: The Third Wave www.bpm3.com > >Howard Smith/CSC/BPMI.org >cell +44 7711 594 494 (worldwide) >home office +44 20 8660 1963 This email is confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not copy or disclose its content but delete the email and contact the sender immediately. Whilst we run antivirus software on all internet emails we are not liable for any loss or damage. The recipient is advised to run their own antivirus software. This email is confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not copy or disclose its content but delete the email and contact the sender immediately. Whilst we run antivirus software on all internet emails we are not liable for any loss or damage. The recipient is advised to run their own antivirus software.
Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 07:36:52 UTC