W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > May 2003

Re: Straw-man Proposal for our mission statement

From: Monica J. Martin <monica.martin@sun.com>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 22:56:21 -0600
Message-ID: <3EBF2975.2060508@sun.com>
To: "Patil, Sanjaykumar" <sanjay.patil@iona.com>, public-ws-chor@w3.org

Patil, Sanjaykumar wrote:

>This is good. 
>Some nitpicking:
>- Can we say "global view" instead of "common view". There is a difference, isn't it.
>- Aren't role and responsibility the same? Can we instead say  "roles and their interactions are clearly defined ..."
mm1: You can have a role; responsibility may equate to what context that 
role takes on when bound to an interaction (instance).  I believe we had 
discussed earlier 'participant' in this context.  Comments anyone?

>- The auomatable, machine-readable attributes are important.  But we need to identify what exactly needs to be machine readable (the definition of global view?) and what needs to be automatable (the process of deriving each participants obligations from the global view?)
>However this definition gives me a feeling that we are getting there. 
>Sanjay Patil
>Distinguished Engineer
Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 00:48:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:04 UTC