- From: Monica J. Martin <monica.martin@sun.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 22:56:21 -0600
- To: "Patil, Sanjaykumar" <sanjay.patil@iona.com>, public-ws-chor@w3.org
Patil, Sanjaykumar wrote: >This is good. > >Some nitpicking: >- Can we say "global view" instead of "common view". There is a difference, isn't it. >- Aren't role and responsibility the same? Can we instead say "roles and their interactions are clearly defined ..." > > mm1: You can have a role; responsibility may equate to what context that role takes on when bound to an interaction (instance). I believe we had discussed earlier 'participant' in this context. Comments anyone? >- The auomatable, machine-readable attributes are important. But we need to identify what exactly needs to be machine readable (the definition of global view?) and what needs to be automatable (the process of deriving each participants obligations from the global view?) > >However this definition gives me a feeling that we are getting there. > >Sanjay Patil >Distinguished Engineer >sanjay.patil@iona.com > > >
Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 00:48:29 UTC