- From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 09:26:19 -0700
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Jean-Jacques, I didn't know of the new In/Out MEP. I guess that could be used to indicate request and response on different channels, while the Request/Response remains associated with a unique channel. Ugo > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:30 AM > To: Ugo Corda > Cc: Sanjiva Weerawarana; public-ws-chor@w3.org > Subject: Re: choreography protocol > > > Ugo, did you look at "WSDL 1.2 Part2: Patterns" [1]? Would this help? > > Jean-Jacques. > > [1] > <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl1 2-patterns.html> Ugo Corda wrote: > Yes, relying on the WSDL binding works when you can express that > binding in your spec. But what if you are writing a spec (e.g. a > choreography spec) that prefers to leave WSDL bindings unspecified > but still wants to talk about request/response on the same channel > vs. on different channels? WSDL right now does not specify any way to > express that.
Received on Monday, 23 June 2003 12:26:27 UTC