- From: Jean-Jacques Dubray <jjd@eigner.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:41:43 -0400
- To: "'Yaron Y. Goland'" <ygoland@bea.com>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
We should not tie it to a particular WSDL version (what happens in the future or if WSDL produces a new version before ws-chor work is finished?) "WSDL based" is a bit too strong for me, but I can live with it. I don't like the work "describe", do you mean "model"? It also does not clearly talk to a purpose of describing or modeling. "agrees to accept" does not sounds correct to me. What about "exchange" or "interchange"? At this point I still like Daniel's mission statement and the slight changes I added with suggestions from others. Jean-Jacques >>-----Original Message----- >>From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] >>On Behalf Of Yaron Y. Goland >>Sent: Dienstag, 10. Juni 2003 19:32 >>To: public-ws-chor@w3.org >>Subject: RE: Revised: Mission Statement >> >> >>I would propose the following simplification: >> >>The mission of the W3C Web Service Choreography Working Group is to create >>a >>WSDL 1.2 based machine readable XML language that can describe the >>complete >>set of message sequences a group of cooperating web service peers agrees >>to >>accept. >> >> Yaron >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org >>> [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Monica J. Martin >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:06 AM >>> To: Jean-Jacques Dubray >>> Cc: jdart@tibco.com; public-ws-chor@w3.org >>> Subject: Re: Revised: Mission Statement >>> >>> >>> >>> > >>> > >>> ><<Dubray: Which in clear gives: >>> >The mission of the Web Services Choreography Working Group at W3C is to >>> >specify on the foundation of WSDL the means by which peer Web Services >>> >interact, can be composed, and how the sequencing of messages among >>> >services may be regulated to ensure conformance to interoperability.>> >>> > >>> mm1: +1 except replace 'conformance to interoperability' with >>> 'conformance and interoperability'. This differentiates conformance (to >>> a specification) for a technology vs. interoperabilility between >>> technology solutions or implementations. >>> >>> Monica >>> >>>
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:42:47 UTC