- From: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 14:35:53 -0700
- To: "Ricky Ho" <riho@cisco.com>, "Monica J. Martin" <monica.martin@sun.com>
- Cc: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
A contract in programming terms anyway (e.g. design by contract). Whether it is a legal contrcat is another matter! Martin. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Ricky Ho > Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 7:23 PM > To: Monica J. Martin > Cc: Burdett, David; public-ws-chor@w3.org > Subject: Re: Partial executability/ determinism of a Chor description > language > > > > Monica, > > > >>mm1: The choreography definition should not be a contract, although it > >>may understand the contract when its parameters are expressed in logic > >>(whether in or referenced by the choreography > definition,....we'll see)., > > If Choreography is a sequence of message exchange that every > involved party > agree to follow, then it is a "contract". Is WSDL a "contract" ? > (I think so). > > Best regards, > Ricky > >
Received on Monday, 2 June 2003 17:37:41 UTC