- From: Monica J. Martin <monica.martin@sun.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 20:40:54 -0600
- To: Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com>
- CC: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, public-ws-chor@w3.org
Ricky Ho wrote: > Monica, > > >>> mm1: The choreography definition should not be a contract, although >>> it may understand the contract when its parameters are expressed in >>> logic (whether in or referenced by the choreography >>> definition,....we'll see)., >> > > If Choreography is a sequence of message exchange that every involved > party agree to follow, then it is a "contract". Is WSDL a "contract" > ? (I think so). > > Best regards, > Ricky > mm1: I would say that the WSDL MAY be legally binding, but it is not the contract.
Received on Sunday, 1 June 2003 22:31:42 UTC