- From: Jon Dart <jdart@tibco.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:02:23 -0700
- To: Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>
- CC: public-ws-chor@w3.org
Assaf Arkin wrote: > The term correct behavior means 'working according to specification'. If > it does not work according to specification then it's considered faulty. This formulation doesn't help at all IMO. We're talking about design time, i.e. prior to execution. So what would consitute a choregraphy defintion that didn't "work according to specification"? I guess it could be syntactically incorrect, i.e. not validate according to the specification's schema, but I suspect something else was meant by design-time validation. The requirement is that design-time validation be possible, but nothing is said about what a design-time validator might do, or what kinds of error it might detect. Without saying this, the requirement isn't meaningful IMO. N.b. I am not sure there is a meaningful level of validation that can be done prior to execution, on a design language complex enough to meet the other requirements. --Jon
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2003 17:02:47 UTC