- From: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:14:33 -0700
- To: "Cummins, Fred A" <fred.cummins@eds.com>, "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, "Assaf Arkin" <arkin@intalio.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
+1 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Cummins, Fred A > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:03 PM > To: Ugo Corda; Assaf Arkin > Cc: public-ws-chor@w3.org > Subject: RE: Simple Choreography composition suggestion > > > > Ugo, > > This seems to suggest that a choreograpy defines, or > may define a web service. On the contrary, I see > a choreography as defining relationships between > web services. > > Fred > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com] > > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:07 PM > > To: Assaf Arkin > > Cc: public-ws-chor@w3.org > > Subject: RE: Simple Choreography composition suggestion > > > > > > > > > A choreography as I understand if is a Web service only if > > it has an > > > entry point that is used by someone outside the > > choreography to start > > > it. If the choreography starts when A sends a message to B (A and B > > > being roles covered by the choreography), then it's not a > > Web service. > > > But if the choreography starts by someone sending a message > > to A, where > > > that role is not otherwise covered by the choreography, then that > > > choreography is a Web service. It has an externally > > accessible entry > > > point, or any other term we may opt to use. > > > > > > Since it's a Web service, it can further be used in a larger > > > choreography that may or may not be a Web service. Such a > > choreography > > > would cover that additional role that starts the Web > > service choreography. > > > > Yes, that's basically the point I was making with my BPEL example. > > > > It seems to me that, since choreographies are "made" of Web > > services, establishing this relationship between a > > choreography and the Web service that "encapsulates" that > > same choreography (if any) would provide a way of talking > > about choreographies composition. > > > > Ugo > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2003 17:14:24 UTC