- From: Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 18:31:17 -0700
- CC: public-ws-chor@w3.org
Reading each of the e-mails exchanged so far, I have to say they all make sense. But the thread doesn't make sense at all. And following the conf call discussion was downright impossible. The problem is, someone starts discussing compositions of choreographies for the purpose of reuse, in response we branch into a discussion about composition of services to form a new service, then half-way switch to discussing composition of interfaces to form a choreography, then into discussion of the choreography behind a service. Lots of context switching going on, with not a single participant ever saying "BTW I've just switched context form discussing X to discussing Y". Perhaps we should start by identifying the different types of compositions, and even if there is overlap (and I bet there is), discuss each type of composition in detail as if no other type of composition ever existed. Once we have some better understanding of each type of composition on its own, we can throw them all in a big bowl and make soup out of it ;-) arkin
Received on Sunday, 13 July 2003 14:30:42 UTC