- From: Yaron Goland <ygoland@bea.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:22:25 -0700
- To: <jdart@tibco.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Which requirement do you think would necessitate this? More importantly, what is the use case behind that requirement? Thanks, Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jon Dart > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:12 AM > To: ygoland@bea.com > Cc: public-ws-chor@w3.org > Subject: Re: [ws-chor] 7/28/2003: Reqts 1.0 Comments > > > > Yaron Goland wrote: > > > Where I think the real confusion is coming is from the term > 'control logic'. > > What I specifically mean is that when a web service has an > option for which > > message it can send next then the logic the web service > uses to choose must > > not be expressed in the choreography definition. > > What about something like an iteration facility (which is a > very simple > example of control logic, IMO). If the iteration count is < > 3, you send > a message, otherwise you don't. I think this is probably > necessary given > the other requirements. > > --Jon > > >
Received on Friday, 22 August 2003 02:59:49 UTC