- From: Burdett, David <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:13:44 -0700
- To: "'jdart@tibco.com'" <jdart@tibco.com>, "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
- Cc: Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>, "'Keith Swenson'" <KSwenson@fsw.fujitsu.com>, "'Monica Martin'" <monica.martin@sun.com>, "'Martin Chapman'" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, "'Yves Lafon'" <ylafon@w3.org>, "'Ugo Corda'" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, "'Cummins Fred A'" <fred.cummins@eds.com>, public-ws-chor@w3.org
OK, so should we set up liaisons with other groups, and if so, which ones? I also agree with your comments about relationship with BPEL. I think that using a choreography definition to automatically and indpenently check that the execution of a BPEL defintion is following it correctly, is one reason as it then removes the need for the BPEL spec to check for errors. David -----Original Message----- From: Jon Dart [mailto:jdart@tibco.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 8:54 AM To: Burdett, David Cc: Mark Little; 'Keith Swenson'; 'Monica Martin'; 'Martin Chapman'; 'Yves Lafon'; 'Ugo Corda'; 'Cummins Fred A'; public-ws-chor@w3.org Subject: Re: Correlation Requirements Burdett, David wrote: > Jon > > I agree that we should not define a correlation solution, however I > think our success is dependent on the existence of one as described in > "The specs we need ..." email. > > Do you agree? Actually, I do, but perhaps we disagree on the timing of the resolution. It is possible that by the time we are going into final draft there will be a reasonably mature mechanism for this, or maybe the choice of a couple of ones, so we can leverage parallel work that is already going on. Probably also we need to think harder about how a choroegraphy description might be used with BPEL. This is going to be a FAQ, I am sure. --Jon
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2003 18:11:34 UTC