- From: Jon Dart <jdart@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 08:54:14 -0700
- To: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
- Cc: Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>, "'Keith Swenson'" <KSwenson@fsw.fujitsu.com>, "'Monica Martin'" <monica.martin@sun.com>, "'Martin Chapman'" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, "'Yves Lafon'" <ylafon@w3.org>, "'Ugo Corda'" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, "'Cummins Fred A'" <fred.cummins@eds.com>, public-ws-chor@w3.org
Burdett, David wrote: > Jon > > I agree that we should not define a correlation solution, however I > think our success is dependent on the existence of one as described in > "The specs we need ..." email. > > Do you agree? Actually, I do, but perhaps we disagree on the timing of the resolution. It is possible that by the time we are going into final draft there will be a reasonably mature mechanism for this, or maybe the choice of a couple of ones, so we can leverage parallel work that is already going on. Probably also we need to think harder about how a choroegraphy description might be used with BPEL. This is going to be a FAQ, I am sure. --Jon
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2003 12:00:35 UTC