W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > August 2003

Re: Correlation Requirements

From: Jon Dart <jdart@tibco.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 08:54:14 -0700
To: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
Cc: Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>, "'Keith Swenson'" <KSwenson@fsw.fujitsu.com>, "'Monica Martin'" <monica.martin@sun.com>, "'Martin Chapman'" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, "'Yves Lafon'" <ylafon@w3.org>, "'Ugo Corda'" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, "'Cummins Fred A'" <fred.cummins@eds.com>, public-ws-chor@w3.org
Message-id: <3F390DA6.3000009@tibco.com>

Burdett, David wrote:
> Jon
> I agree that we should not define a correlation solution, however I 
> think our success is dependent on the existence of one as described in 
> "The specs we need ..." email.
> Do you agree?

Actually, I do, but perhaps we disagree on the timing of the resolution. 
It is possible that by the time we are going into final draft there will 
be a reasonably mature mechanism for this, or maybe the choice of a 
couple of ones, so we can leverage parallel work that is already going 
on. Probably also we need to think harder about how a choroegraphy 
description might be used with BPEL. This is going to be a FAQ, I am sure.

Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2003 12:00:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:10 UTC