- From: <Daniel_Austin@grainger.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:40:47 -0500
- To: steve@enigmatec.net
- Cc: public-ws-chor@w3.org, public-ws-chor-request@w3.org
Hi Steve, I'll be glad to provide an introduction to the CSF technique in tomorrow's call. Also, I'd like to add an item about where suggestions for requirements should be sent. We also need to assign an issues editor and clear up some of the fog around the "issues" issue. I'm late on my action item to provide a suggested use-case methodology. I'll try to get this out by tomorrow but don't cross your fingers. Regards, D- ************************************************* Dr. Daniel Austin Sr. Technical Architect / Architecture Team Lead daniel_austin@notes.grainger.com <----- Note change! 847 793 5044 Visit http://www.grainger.com "If I get a little money, I buy books. If there is anything left over, I buy clothing and food." -Erasmus "Steve Ross-Talbot" To: public-ws-chor@w3.org <steve@enigmatec.n cc: et> Subject: Agenda items for 22nd April so far? Sent by: public-ws-chor-req uest@w3.org 04/21/2003 11:25 AM In no particular order I have picked on the following: Review requirements comments (continuing from last week) Discussion of timetable to make requirements public (deferred from last week) Understanding CSF (from last week) Reusable choreographies and data formats (deferred from last week) Formal models and choreography (hot topic from public mailing list) What is a process (hot topic from the mailing list) Dynamically changing participants in a choreography (hot topic from public mailing list) Oasis and BPEL4WS (hot topic from the world around us) Choreography storage and retrieval (hot topic from the public mailing list) The first four need to be on the agenda as they all relate to our current thread of work. The others are topics of interest. We need to ground them in what benefits accrue or what we might loose so that we can all get up to speed on the real relevance of the topics listed. Obviously the standards topics will appear on the agenda (minutes and matters arising and any organisational or administrative matters) but the bulk of the call should be devoted to progress in any of these areas. If you folks could indicate preferences on the last 5 topics or indeed suggest others I shall use the information to set the agenda later today. Cheers Steve T This email is confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not copy or disclose its content but delete the email and contact the sender immediately. Whilst we run antivirus software on all internet emails we are not liable for any loss or damage. The recipient is advised to run their own antivirus software.
Received on Monday, 21 April 2003 13:40:45 UTC