- From: <Daniel_Austin@grainger.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:59:46 -0500
- To: tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com
- Cc: Daniel_Austin@grainger.com, martin.chapman@oracle.com, public-ws-chor@w3.org, public-ws-chor-request@w3.org, steve@enigmatec.net
Hi Folks,
This sort of mail needs to also be CC'd to the issues mailing list.
Has that been established yet?
Regards,
D-
*************************************************
Dr. Daniel Austin
Sr. Technical Architect / Architecture Team Lead
daniel_austin@notes.grainger.com <----- Note change!
847 793 5044
Visit http://www.grainger.com
"If I get a little money, I buy books. If there is anything left over, I
buy clothing and food."
-Erasmus
"Tony Fletcher"
<tony_fletcher@btope To: public-ws-chor@w3.org, Daniel_Austin@grainger.com
nworld.com> cc: "'Martin Chapman'" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, steve@enigmatec.net
Sent by: Subject: Requirement - Ability to store and retrieve from a registry /
public-ws-chor-reque repository
st@w3.org
04/17/2003 03:55 AM
Dear Daniel et al,
I would like to highlight that if the point that if the gist of what Fred
says below is agreed, then it contains a requirement in the language that
should be in our Requirements document.
That is it shall be possible and practicable to store instances of use of
the WS-Chor language in a Registry / Repository, to be a able to search for
such instances and to retrieve them.
Best Regards Tony
A M Fletcher
Cohesions 1.0 (TM)
Business transaction management software for application coordination
Choreology Ltd., 13 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2JX UK
Tel: +44 (0) 20 76701787 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7670 1785 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801
948219
tony.fletcher@choreology.com (Home: amfletcher@iee.org)
-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Cummins, Fred A
Sent: 12 April 2003 00:09
To: Stephen White; Assaf Arkin; Patil, Sanjaykumar
Cc: Martin Chapman; Burdett, David; Cummins, Fred A; jdart@tibco.com;
public-ws-chor@w3.org
Subject: RE: Internal processes and/or external choreographies (was
RE: Events and States ...
Steve,
I believe the choreography language should express the exchange at
the level of abstraction that is appropriate for business people to
understand. This does not mean that the form of expression is
appropriate for business people. I beleive we should focus on the
XML form of expression as that is the form that will be appropriate
for retrieval from registries and exchanged between potential
participants in a web services exchange. A form suitable for
business users should be deferred since this requires different
skills and can be done in different ways by different tools without
adverse impact on the computational web services protocol
specifications and implementations.
Fred
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2003 10:59:44 UTC