- From: Howard N Smith <howard.smith@ontology.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:38:08 +0100
- To: public-ws-chor@w3.org
Assaf said in response to JJ: >I know SQL and COBOL are severly limited and not quite useful in the business world. Love it. LOL. and he went on: >Still I would be willing to claim success if we get one choreography definition for every COBOL program or SQL statement used in an enterprise application. When we get to that >point, let's revisit the issue and ask where we've gone wrong ;-) Indeed so. For the purpose of BPM is not to replace everything, but to include everything, and to describe everything, such that it can be consolidated and managed and integrated and customised and all the other BP management things we want to do ... and this emphasis lies at the heart of the matter for me. H
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2003 04:38:50 UTC