Re: security-digest

security-digest        Volume 05 : Number 179

In this issue:
Re: OT: yet another discussion FTP vs HTTP (was: IPFW almost worksnow.)
Re: HTTP and FTP
Re: port scan detector
Re: IPFW almost works now.
Re: IPFW almost works now. (fwd) - correction
Re: IPFW almost works now.
Re: RELENG_4_3
Re: IPFW almost works now.
OT: FTP almost gone now? (was: Re: IPFW almost works now.)
Re: IPFW almost works now.
Re: OT: FTP almost gone now? (was: Re: IPFW almost works now.)
Re: tripwire
Re: OT: FTP almost gone now? (was: Re: IPFW almost works now.)
Re: OT: FTP almost gone now? (was: Re: IPFW almost works now.)
FW: FTP almost gone now? (was: Re: IPFW almost works now.)
Re: IPFW almost works now.
Re: FW: FTP almost gone now? (was: Re: IPFW almost works now.)
Re: OT: FTP almost gone now? (was: Re: IPFW almost works now.)
Re: OT: FTP almost gone now? (was: Re: IPFW almost works now.)
Re: tripwire
Re: OT: FTP almost gone now? (was: Re: IPFW almost works now.)
Re: HTTP and FTP

------------------------------ ------------------------------ ----------

Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:32:56 -0400
From: "Antoine Beaupre (LMC)" <Antoine.Beau...@ericsson.ca>
Subject: Re: OT: yet another discussion FTP vs HTTP (was: IPFW almost worksnow.)

Actually, that's one thing I wondered about.. Do sftp need the user to
have a valid shell?

There's always nologin...

But passwd is also a very neat idea. :)



--- GoldED/386 2.42.G0614+
 * Origin: Everything goes the bach runter ... 
 * http://www.w3travelguides.com