- From: Tony Fletcher <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 20:40:32 +0100
- To: "'Martin Chapman'" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org>
Dear Martin and the WS-Choreography team, Contrary to my expectation it appears that for the current WS-Choreography specification the ordering is defined for each and every element and that lexically ordering is not used (as it is in at least some programming languages such as Java). So according to my present understanding this resolution satisfies my concerns and I am happy for this issue to be closed. Best Regards Tony A M Fletcher Cohesions (TM) Business transaction management software for application coordination www.choreology.com Choreology Ltd., 68 Lombard Street, London EC3V 9LJ UK Tel: +44 (0) 1473 729537 Mobile: +44 (0) 7801 948219 tony.fletcher@choreology.com (Home: amfletcher@iee.org) -----Original Message----- From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com] Sent: 10 May 2005 15:30 To: 'TONY FLETCHER' Cc: public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org Subject: W3C WS-Choreo WG - Issue 998 Tony, Regarding Issue 998 [1]. At its meeting on 12 April 2005 [2], the work group agreed to close this issue with no change to the spec Please let the Working Group know if this resolution [1] is acceptable or not as soon as possible. Martin. [1]http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=998 [2]http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/chor/5/04/12-minutes.html _________________________________________________________________ Martin Chapman Consulting Member of Technical Staff Oracle P: +353 87 687 6654 e: martin.chapman@oracle.com
Received on Sunday, 15 May 2005 20:29:22 UTC