Fw: Last Call Issue: WORKUNIT REPETITION from Gary Brown on 2005-01-10 (public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org from January 2005)

From: Gary Brown <gary@enigmatec.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:56:11 -0000
To: <public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <006301c4f72c$ec78fbf0$0200a8c0@LATTITUDEGary>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Gary Brown 
To: public-ws-chor@w3.org 
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 2:18 PM
Subject: Last Call Issue: WORKUNIT REPETITION


Suggestion from Kohei based on his analysis of the workunit semantics for repetition:

> 
> We therefore believe it is better to have two workunits, one for non-repeating,
> and another for repeating. If this is too radical, then we recommend not to have
> two conditions, but to differentiate between repeating and non-repeating by:
> 
> repeat = true|false 

Regards
Gary and Steve

Received on Monday, 10 January 2005 15:56:30 UTC