- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:57:19 +0200
- To: "Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org>
* Martin Chapman wrote: >I solicited feedback from the WG on this issue and this email seem to >sum up the groups position: > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Aug/0007.html Would it be possible to define the extension conformance requirements indirectly through conformance requirements for implementations? For example, Implementations of extensions MUST ... Extensions that require implementations to violate the requirement above are not allowed. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2005 14:57:27 UTC