RE: W3C WS-Choreo WG - Issue 964

Bjoern,

We discussed this at our con call  yesterday:
http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-ws-chor-irc


The problem you are citing should be resolved by the text in the 4th
paragraph of section 5.3:
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/chor/edcopies/cdl/cdl.html

I hope this is acceptable.

Martin.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] 
>Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 7:53 PM
>To: Martin Chapman
>Cc: public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org
>Subject: Re: W3C WS-Choreo WG - Issue 964
>
>
>* Martin Chapman wrote:
>>The document [2] does contain a table in section 1.1 that defines all 
>>namespace prefixes. At our meeting on 11th January 2005 [3], the 
>>workgroup therefore unanimously agreed to close this
>>issue without change.
>
>>[1]http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=964
>
>I am not sure the Working Group really understood the issue, 
>the apparently complete examples do something like this:
>
>  <?xml version='1.0'?>
>  <element xpath='cdl:example(...)' />
>
>How is the XPath engine supposed to know about the 'cdl' 
>prefix? What would happen for something like
>
>  <?xml version='1.0'?>
>  <element xmlns:cdl='... not cdl ...' xpath='cdl:example(...)' />
>
>is this still a reference to a cdl function? What if
>
>  <?xml version='1.0'?>
>  <element xmlns:foo='http://www.w3.org/2004/12/ws-chor/cdl'
>    xpath='foo:example(...)' />
>
>is this a reference to a cdl function? None of this is 
>currently defined in the draft as far as I can tell. The 
>prefix table is fine, but the apparently complete examples in 
>the draft are not guranteed to work as advertized without 
>clearer conformance re- quirements. I think the XML Query / 
>XSL Working Groups should review the use of XPath in the 
>document, I am happy to defer to them on this issue.
>-- 
>Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · 
>http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · >Telefon: 
>+49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim 
>· PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
>

Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:17:23 UTC