RE: W3C WS-Choreo WG - Issue 973

Bjoern,

We discussed 973 on our con call last night:
http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-ws-chor-irc

The group felt that putting an example in that showed an extension
contradicting the specification was not appropraite (like a negative
test). However, the group did agree to put such an example in the
primer, which is currently being drafted.

I hope this is acceptable.

Martin.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] 
>Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 8:01 PM
>To: Martin Chapman
>Cc: public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org
>Subject: Re: W3C WS-Choreo WG - Issue 973
>
>
>* Martin Chapman wrote:
>>Regarding Issue 973 [1].
>>
>>As a result of this issue, the working group agreed to change wording 
>>in the spec.
>
>>[1]http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=973
>
>I don't think the new text is an improvement, there also does 
>not seem to be an example to illustrate the requirement as I 
>request, I still don't understand what the text is trying to 
>get across so I'm afraid I can't make a suggestion on how to 
>improve this.
>-- 
>Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · 
>http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · >Telefon: 
>+49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim 
>· PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
>

Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:04:42 UTC