"ACK required" => "no reply required" from David Hull on 2005-03-29 (public-ws-async-tf@w3.org from March 2005)

From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:04:05 -0500
To: public-ws-async-tf@w3.org
Message-id: <42499895.7030604@tibco.com>

A slight erratum:

Given that the existing behavior always requires a reply, any marker 
aimed at allowing back-channels to close should be cast as boolean "back 
channel may be closed", defaulting to "false".  This is a bit 
counter-intuitive by itself, but it allows existing proxies that don't 
know anything to ignore the new flag.  The back-channel only closes if 
the sender asked for it and the receiver knows how to recognize this.

Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2005 18:04:43 UTC