Re: Ueber-MEPs and points North

David,

The über-MEP that we discussed on the call was in-optional-out.
IIRC, this was also a SOAP MEP and *not* a WSDL MEP.
Therefore, 'out-only' would not be covered by this über-MEP.

-Anish
--

David Hull wrote:
> 
> For the benefit of those who, through nobody's fault but their own, 
> didn't make the last conference call (and for anyone else just reading 
> the list and not on the concalls), could someone outline how the new 
> "über-MEP" would work?  From context, I gather that it would be composed 
> of an "in" segment and an "out" segment, both optional, with "in-only", 
> "out-only" and "in-out" falling out as special cases.  Is this basically 
> correct?
> 
> 

Received on Monday, 28 March 2005 22:26:42 UTC