RE: Additional scenarios

The polling section of the doc has been filled in since May.  On my
computer.  Not on the net.  My bad.  

It has a post of a echoString, followed by a 300 redirect, followed by a
GET.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Hadley [mailto:Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 8:08 AM
> To: David Orchard
> Cc: public-ws-async-tf@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Additional scenarios
> 
> On Jul 8, 2005, at 8:26 PM, David Orchard wrote:
> > I heard a request for 2 scenarios to be added to the async
> > scenarios document [1], the "redirect" of POST for the Response,
> > and the cell phone case where the first http message is a
> > "GETRequest" returning the actual request, then the next message is
> > the response.
> >
> >
> >
> > Now, there are 2 scenarios that are in there that I think do
> > exactly these, the "polling" and the "protocol response contains
> > request".  I asked a number of questions in those scenarios and
> > didn't get any responses.
> >
> >
> The "Polling" section (which I assume is the one intended to cover
> the POST redirect I sketched out[2]) is completely empty unless I'm
> looking at the wrong version. Also I wouldn't categorize this as a
> "Complex Scenario", its just HTTP operating as HTTP specifies.
> 
> Marc.
> 
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-async-tf/2005Feb/
> 0005.html
> >
> >
> > Could somebody tell me where the existing scenarios document falls
> > short?  And also if these scenarios are so important that they have
> > to be included, why there hasn't been any comments on them or
> > answers to the asked questions?
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> > [1]
http://www.pacificspirit.com/Authoring/async/async-scenarios.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ---
> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
> Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
>

Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2005 17:41:02 UTC