- From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:17:41 -0500
- To: "David Hull" <dmh@tibco.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-async-tf@w3.org>
> >* What is the minimal change that would be necessary to what
> spec(s) in
> >order to achieve this case?
> >
> >
> If WSDL bindings supported a "dynamic" indicating that a particular
> endpoint or endpoints in a MEP are dynamically specified, e.g., via
> WS-A. In practice, this would mean the reply and fault addresses for
> request/reply and robust out-only, and possibly analogously for
> solicit/response (or whatever we call it these days) and
> robust in-only.
I assume this would be on the operation? Or do you mean on individual
messages? An attribute, or a new extension element? Something like:
<wsdl:binding type="...soap12"
wsoap:protocol=".../http">
<wsdl:operation ref="getStockQuote"
wsa:dynamic="true"/>
</wsdl:binding>
?
Would you think it important to enable including a list of "supported"
backchannel protocols (i.e. here are the protocols I know how to send
via, so if you send me an EPR with another one I'll barf)?
--Glen
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:18:06 UTC