W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > January 2007

RE: Proposed response: Default Action Pattern for inherited faults

From: Paul Knight <paul.knight@nortel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:50:40 -0500
Message-ID: <4B7DAC3FEFD35D4A96BDD011699050140CD2023B@zrtphxm1.corp.nortel.com>
To: "Cindy McNally" <cindymcnally_6@hotmail.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

The WG considered this as well as the issue in 

 and came to the conclusion that no action is needed.

A key point we considered is that infault and outfault with the same
name might be an issue, but not for WSDL 1.1.
It was also pointed out in the discussion that the default pattern does
take into account the direction, so it is not an issue, because the
direction token may be used to differentiate between input and output.

In general, the response agreed by the WG is that faults are inherited
and the interface should work, therefore no change is required.

- Paul

Paul Knight 
Standards Advisor - SOA & Web Services
Received on Monday, 22 January 2007 21:51:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:15 UTC