- From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:14:41 -0800
- To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
- CC: "[WS-A]" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Wasn't the original decision to close the issue with no action based on the fact that majority wanted to proceed to LC? -Anish -- Christopher B Ferris wrote: > > Bob, > > The WS-Policy WG closed this issue with no action, based on the fact > that there was no new evidence > presented that would change the resolution to an original decision of > the WG that raised the same substantive > question. > > Please see the resolution text in the issue itself [1] > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4129 > > Cheers, > > Christopher Ferris > STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris > phone: +1 508 377 9295 > > public-ws-policy-request@w3.org wrote on 01/08/2007 08:13:31 PM: > > > The WS-Addressing WG has no specific comments concerning the LC > > drafts of WS-Policy. > > There is, however one specific Bugzilla Log, Number 4129 [1] which > > relates to WS-Addressing and the manner in which Policy may be > > attached to an epr. This log has the interest of the WS-Addressing > > WG and the WG is interested in the manner of its resolution. > > > > Thanks > > -bob > > > > Bob Freund > > Chair, WS-Addressing for the WS-Addressing WG > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4129
Received on Friday, 19 January 2007 01:16:54 UTC