- From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:34:20 -0500
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
This is good, but I think what's missing here and elsewhere is which variables are independent and which are dependent. I think in this case the first two are independent and the last dependent. Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 15:07 -0500, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: >> On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 11:49 -0500, David Hull wrote: >> > * I believe this has already been done to death, but my $0.02 on >> > table 3-1 is that it's not immediately clear what "REQUIRED" >> > means. I'd naively think it meant that the MAPs are required, >> > but that seems redundant in the row marked "yes" for MAPs in input >> > message. From the subsequent text I gather it means "you have to >> > include the required MAPs." Since the requirements are clearly >> > spelled out in section 5, perhaps "see section 5", or "as per >> > section 5" or such might be clearer. >> >> The table is mixing several information making it difficult to read. >> > > The table format was lost in my message, so here is the table in HTML: > *wsdl:required* *MAPs in Input message?* *MAPs in Output message?* > true Yes Yes > true No The endpoint MUST generate a SOAP Fault. > false Yes Yes > false No Optional. If using SOAP, MAP headers MUST NOT have a > soap:mustUnderstand attribute with a value of "true" > > > Philippe >
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 20:34:31 UTC