- From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:49:25 -0500
- To: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
* The introduction states that "Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Metadata (this document) defines how the abstract properties defined in Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Core are described using WSDL." This is true but not complete, particularly since we now emphasize WS-Policy as well. * I believe this has already been done to death, but my $0.02 on table 3-1 is that it's not immediately clear what "REQUIRED" means. I'd naively think it meant that the MAPs are required, but that seems redundant in the row marked "yes" for MAPs in input message. From the subsequent text I gather it means "you have to include the required MAPs." Since the requirements are clearly spelled out in section 5, perhaps "see section 5", or "as per section 5" or such might be clearer. * In the text after the table, we might want to refer back to the place where we defined "WS-A is engaged". Similarly "this specification" is a bit ambiguous. I believe we mean either "the rest of the specification (core and SOAP)" or "the whole of WS-A" (including perhaps parts yet to be added on?), and not just the Metadata document. * The NOTE in section 3.2.3 after the first paragraph that if both anonymous and non anonymous responses are supported there should be a separate alternative including only anonymous responses consists of one long sentence with no punctuation making it fairly hard to parse but also lending it a certain Joycean quality which is to be commended.
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 16:49:41 UTC